While the young professors shared a love of the outdoors and the adventures of travelling (without reservations) their conversations often returned to matters academe:
...musing over fact that so many college undergraduates acquire a haphazard and incomplete education, we conceived of a course of studies, based on a 5 course a year, 4 year plan, with spectator sports out, some personal athletics substituted, formal and non formal (i.e., games or hiking, etc.), outside activities of fraternity type either de-emphasized or ennobled.
Our idea is this. Require 4 of following sciences: geology, chemistry, physics, botany-biology, astronomy; 4 courses of language, all one or 2-2 split; 4 courses in a combined history-economics-political science; 1 course in art or music appreciation; 1 course in general philosophy; of the 2 remaining, they would have to be elected in one of above fields, and whatever they were elected in, added to what one already had to take, would = major and minor.
Difference between major and minor would consist in an original paper and research, which would be necessary for granting a degree - i.e., whichever of 2 fields one wrote his paper in would = major. Since everyone isn't equally proficient in all fields, he would be allowed to put more time in his favorites - a certain number of term papers would be required - one or 2 a year and these could be done in the courses most interesting to student, carrying with them extra credits - so many of which (4 or 8) would be needed to graduate.
The idea in all these courses would be to give student integrated picture of world he lives in, eliminate petty details, etc. Idea not to turn out professional historians, chemists, etc. but educated men with broad outlook in life. Each department would realize this, help teach their courses with this general plan in mind.
To prevent possible cry of a tendency in this plan to make for lack of originality and breed uniformity of minds, there would be 2 or 3 times a week round table discussions led by professors where students would discuss and debate ideas, help integrate their knowledge as they went along. Also, since extracurricular activities would be de-emphasized students would be encouraged to spend their leisure time following ideas that interested them, and all teachers would be expected to help students on those problems and researches.
A good library would be essential, teachers interested in teaching more than merely research (although research to some extent would be wanted among the faculty), good outside lectures, opportunities to hear good artists, exhibitions of paintings, etc.
Variations in this curriculum plan easily possible - if man saw he liked languages, say French, in addition to his 4 years, he could take one extra course, and substitute, say his 4th year of English (of the 4 years, one would be composition rest poetry and other forms of lit. and some world lit.) for extra course in French. Independent work with professional help would be encouraged.
Such a curriculum would lead to a Ph.B. It could be done in a small college, or as part of a big college, taking in the more promising students, especially the "C" group - those with some ability but who under normal conditions leave college with a smattering of much, a grasp of little. D & F students would be out.
This plan, or with modifications, affords a more or less balanced education, something today quite lacking in college education.
-Written by Armand Singer on August 10, 1943.
Photo: zesmeralda